The Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem is a fundamental theorem in topology. In fact, when I took algebraic topology, it seemed like we proved it differently every few weeks. Indeed, the proofs using homotopy, homology, and degree theory are all elegant, but I will not present them in this post. Instead I will present a proof due to Emanuel Sperner that I find brilliant. The proof is based on Sperner’s Lemma, which I proved last time.

Let . For each , let denote the -th standard basis vector of . The standard -simplex, denoted , is the set

You should verify that is the point , that is the line segment from to , that is the standard triangle in , and so on.

Before we proceed, let’s fix some notation. Each point in admits a unique expression in barycentric coordinates: with each and . So we’ll put . So, for example, if , then , , and . Admittedly, this is not my favorite notation, but it’ll do.

**Theorem. (Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem for Simplexes) If is a continuous function, then there exists for which .**

Assume that has no fixed points. Let be a sequence of simplicial subdivisions of whose mesh tends to zero. Define a labeling on the vertices of by

.

First, note that is a valid labeling since and has no fixed points (the coordinates have to change somewhere, and so any increase in a coordinate forces a decrease in another coordinate). Moreover, since barycentric coordinates are unique, the labeling is well-defined. I claim that is a Sperner labeling.

- First, notice that (write it out).
- Secondly, if is a vertex that lies on the facet spanned by , then the -th coordinate of is zero and so .

Hence is a Sperner labeling. By Sperner’s Lemma, there exists a completely labeled subsimplex, call it and denote its vertices by so that . Since is compact, for each the sequence admits a convergence subsequence. However, so that we don’t have to bother with the notation, we we can either reindex or assume without loss of generality that each converges. Since the mesh of tends to zero, we see that the sequences all share a common limit point, call it . But then by the continuity of , since for each , it follows that

Thus for all . Since admits no fixed point, it must be the case that for some . But then we see that

a contradiction. So admits a fixed point, as claimed.

The preceding proof should remind you of my proof of the intermediate value theorem. These two examples should better illustrate how one may exploit compactness to turn Sperner’s Lemma from a discrete tool to a continuous one. The familiar reader will have noticed that I haven’t really proven the Brouwer fixed point theorem, at least not directly. So let us recall that is the -dimensional unit disc. Proving the original Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem is just two hand waves away!

**Theorem (Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem) If is a continuous function, then there exists for which .**

It is clear that is homeomorphic to , so let be such a homeomorphism. Then is continuous and so, by the previous theorem, there exists for which . But then . So admits a fixed point, as desired.

I really like this proof of the Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem because it really doesn’t require as much as the other standard proofs. Now that I have given at least one precise proof, I won’t feel bad asserting an obscene amount of algebraic topology in my next few posts as I present some alternate proofs. Thanks for reading.

Pingback: A second proof of Brouwer’s Theorem. | Alexander Adam Azzam

Pingback: Kakutani’s Fixed Point Theorem | Alexander Adam Azzam